These are the Headline Benchmark results for a computer equipped with a Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3632QM CPU @ 2.20GHz, 8.05M RAM and a Mesa DRI Intel(R) Ivybridge Mobile graphics processor. Result submitted by Lucas.
Compared with: Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz, 3G RAM and a ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series. (Change)
Headline scores: How well the computer performs generally, and for some common usage scenarios:
| Headline | 9.66 |
|
3.30 |
| Gaming | 6.14 |
|
2.21 |
| Office | 9.66 |
|
3.30 |
| Creative | 8.81 |
|
2.13 |
Share this result with your friends!
Components: Performance of the main parts of the computer:
| CPU | 10.19 |
|
3.89 |
| Graphics | 3.28 |
|
1.50 |
| Memory | 17.16 |
|
3.98 |
CPU Performance
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3632QM CPU @ 2.20GHz versus...
Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz
Integer arithmetic: The graph shows integer arithmetic performance at increasing numbers of threads:
| Threads | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 45.45M |
|
18.45M |
| 2 | 43.63M |
|
30.50M |
| 3 | 40.52M |
|
31.98M |
| 4 | 160.68M |
|
35.70M |
| 5 | 39.87M |
|
0 |
| 6 | 73.07M |
|
0 |
| 7 | 137.37M |
|
0 |
| 8 | 141.38M |
|
0 |
| 9 | 191.79M |
|
0 |
| 10 | 200.81M |
|
0 |
| 11 | 237.43M |
|
0 |
| 12 | 165.91M |
|
0 |
Floating point arithmetic: The graph shows floating point arithmetic performance at increasing numbers of threads:
| Threads | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 39.44M |
|
17.41M |
| 2 | 75.64M |
|
25.78M |
| 3 | 72.42M |
|
31.52M |
| 4 | 139.78M |
|
33.46M |
| 5 | 133.90M |
|
0 |
| 6 | 89.86M |
|
0 |
| 7 | 79.66M |
|
0 |
| 8 | 88.49M |
|
0 |
| 9 | 84.05M |
|
0 |
| 10 | 130.30M |
|
0 |
| 11 | 129.81M |
|
0 |
| 12 | 115.40M |
|
0 |
Peak memory transfer: The graph shows the relative peak memory transfer rate for the tested CPU:
| Block size | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.32M |
|
2.76M |
Graphics Performance
Mesa DRI Intel(R) Ivybridge Mobile versus...
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series
The graphics results indicate driver issues were encountered.
Graphics performance (complex geometry): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly complex geometry:
| Vertexes | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 20K | 60 |
|
37 |
| 80K | 60 |
|
11 |
| 180K | 60 |
|
0 |
| 320K | 60 |
|
0 |
| 500K | 60 |
|
0 |
| 980K | 60 |
|
0 |
| 2M | 60 |
|
0 |
| 3.92M | 60 |
|
0 |
| 8M | 60 |
|
0 |
| 15.68M | 60 |
|
0 |
| 32M | 60 |
|
0 |
Graphics performance (multiple textures): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly large amounts of textures:
| Texture swaps | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 960 | 60 |
|
34 |
| 1.92K | 49 |
|
19 |
| 3.84K | 28 |
|
0 |
| 7.68K | 20 |
|
0 |
Graphics performance (pixel shaders): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly complex fragment shader programs:
| Program Size | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 48 |
|
33 |
| 21 | 48 |
|
16 |
| 57 | 48 |
|
0 |
| 165 | 41 |
|
0 |
| 489 | 13 |
|
0 |
Memory Performance
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3632QM CPU @ 2.20GHz versus...
Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz
Memory performance: The graph shows the relative data transfer rate at for memory blocks of increasing size.:
| Swap size (Bytes) | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | 14.43M |
|
1.51M |
| 1K | 16.76M |
|
2.05M |
| 2K | 17.31M |
|
2.03M |
| 4K | 18.20M |
|
2.38M |
| 8K | 17.09M |
|
2.49M |
| 16K | 18.24M |
|
2.43M |
| 32K | 16.53M |
|
2.29M |
| 64K | 15.75M |
|
2.73M |
| 128K | 15.40M |
|
2.41M |
| 256K | 13.84M |
|
2.25M |
| 512K | 15.14M |
|
1.83M |
| 1.02M | 15.52M |
|
1.20M |
| 2.05M | 15.66M |
|
1.09M |
| 4.10M | 15.39M |
|
1.40M |
| 8.19M | 11.73M |
|
1.41M |
| 16.38M | 11.21M |
|
491.52K |
| 32.77M | 10.55M |
|
1.51M |