These are the Headline Benchmark results for a computer equipped with a Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3960X CPU @ 3.30GHz, 17.12G RAM and a AMD Radeon R9 200 Series graphics processor. Result submitted by JED.
Compared with: Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz, 3G RAM and a ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series. (Change)
Headline scores: How well the computer performs generally, and for some common usage scenarios:
Headline | 18.18 |
|
3.30 |
Gaming | 14.25 |
|
2.21 |
Office | 16.38 |
|
3.30 |
Creative | 16.61 |
|
2.13 |
Share this result with your friends!
Components: Performance of the main parts of the computer:
CPU | 20.51 |
|
3.89 |
Graphics | 12.58 |
|
1.50 |
Memory | 19.07 |
|
3.98 |
CPU Performance
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3960X CPU @ 3.30GHz versus...
Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz
Integer arithmetic: The graph shows integer arithmetic performance at increasing numbers of threads:
Threads | Performance | ||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 66.38M |
|
18.45M |
2 | 132.49M |
|
30.50M |
3 | 198.82M |
|
31.98M |
4 | 132.52M |
|
35.70M |
5 | 264.76M |
|
0 |
6 | 396.46M |
|
0 |
7 | 261.11M |
|
0 |
8 | 255.18M |
|
0 |
9 | 429.96M |
|
0 |
10 | 349.66M |
|
0 |
11 | 404.25M |
|
0 |
12 | 448.84M |
|
0 |
13 | 590.14M |
|
0 |
14 | 663.78M |
|
0 |
15 | 704.06M |
|
0 |
16 | 716.65M |
|
0 |
Floating point arithmetic: The graph shows floating point arithmetic performance at increasing numbers of threads:
Threads | Performance | ||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 53.02M |
|
17.41M |
2 | 106.09M |
|
25.78M |
3 | 106M |
|
31.52M |
4 | 158.69M |
|
33.46M |
5 | 264.07M |
|
0 |
6 | 210.60M |
|
0 |
7 | 312.54M |
|
0 |
8 | 296.51M |
|
0 |
9 | 328.15M |
|
0 |
10 | 389.80M |
|
0 |
11 | 334.48M |
|
0 |
12 | 364.74M |
|
0 |
13 | 378.73M |
|
0 |
14 | 467.34M |
|
0 |
15 | 509.37M |
|
0 |
16 | 505.59M |
|
0 |
Peak memory transfer: The graph shows the relative peak memory transfer rate for the tested CPU:
Block size | Performance | ||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 19.70M |
|
2.76M |
Graphics Performance
AMD Radeon R9 200 Series versus...
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series
Graphics performance (complex geometry): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly complex geometry:
Vertexes | Performance | ||
---|---|---|---|
20K | 60 |
|
37 |
80K | 59 |
|
11 |
180K | 59 |
|
0 |
320K | 59 |
|
0 |
500K | 60 |
|
0 |
980K | 43 |
|
0 |
2M | 27 |
|
0 |
3.92M | 14 |
|
0 |
Graphics performance (multiple textures): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly large amounts of textures:
Texture swaps | Performance | ||
---|---|---|---|
960 | 59 |
|
34 |
1.92K | 59 |
|
19 |
3.84K | 59 |
|
0 |
7.68K | 29 |
|
0 |
15.36K | 19 |
|
0 |
Graphics performance (pixel shaders): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly complex fragment shader programs:
Program Size | Performance | ||
---|---|---|---|
9 | 60 |
|
33 |
21 | 60 |
|
16 |
57 | 60 |
|
0 |
165 | 60 |
|
0 |
489 | 48 |
|
0 |
1.46K | 24 |
|
0 |
4.38K | 8 |
|
0 |
Memory Performance
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3960X CPU @ 3.30GHz versus...
Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz
Memory performance: The graph shows the relative data transfer rate at for memory blocks of increasing size.:
Swap size (Bytes) | Performance | ||
---|---|---|---|
500 | 17.95M |
|
1.51M |
1K | 18.56M |
|
2.05M |
2K | 18.15M |
|
2.03M |
4K | 18.83M |
|
2.38M |
8K | 19.25M |
|
2.49M |
16K | 19.61M |
|
2.43M |
32K | 19.69M |
|
2.29M |
64K | 19.50M |
|
2.73M |
128K | 19.42M |
|
2.41M |
256K | 19.01M |
|
2.25M |
512K | 18.93M |
|
1.83M |
1.02M | 18.92M |
|
1.20M |
2.05M | 18.95M |
|
1.09M |
4.10M | 18.98M |
|
1.40M |
8.19M | 16.30M |
|
1.41M |
16.38M | 15.17M |
|
491.52K |
32.77M | 15.14M |
|
1.51M |