These are the Headline Benchmark results for a computer equipped with a Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3960X CPU @ 3.30GHz, 17.12G RAM and a AMD Radeon R9 200 Series graphics processor. Result submitted by JED.
Compared with: Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz, 3G RAM and a ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series. (Change)
Headline scores: How well the computer performs generally, and for some common usage scenarios:
Headline | 18.33 |
|
3.30 |
Gaming | 14.46 |
|
2.21 |
Office | 16.52 |
|
3.30 |
Creative | 16.62 |
|
2.13 |
Share this result with your friends!
Components: Performance of the main parts of the computer:
CPU | 20.49 |
|
3.89 |
Graphics | 12.66 |
|
1.50 |
Memory | 20.04 |
|
3.98 |
CPU Performance
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3960X CPU @ 3.30GHz versus...
Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz
Integer arithmetic: The graph shows integer arithmetic performance at increasing numbers of threads:
Threads | Performance | ||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 66.05M |
|
18.45M |
2 | 132.01M |
|
30.50M |
3 | 131.99M |
|
31.98M |
4 | 197.96M |
|
35.70M |
5 | 329.51M |
|
0 |
6 | 328.90M |
|
0 |
7 | 326.41M |
|
0 |
8 | 319.22M |
|
0 |
9 | 305.61M |
|
0 |
10 | 293.31M |
|
0 |
11 | 460.29M |
|
0 |
12 | 335.66M |
|
0 |
13 | 692.45M |
|
0 |
14 | 701.40M |
|
0 |
15 | 705.02M |
|
0 |
16 | 718.11M |
|
0 |
Floating point arithmetic: The graph shows floating point arithmetic performance at increasing numbers of threads:
Threads | Performance | ||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 53.53M |
|
17.41M |
2 | 107.03M |
|
25.78M |
3 | 160.29M |
|
31.52M |
4 | 160.08M |
|
33.46M |
5 | 212.95M |
|
0 |
6 | 264.31M |
|
0 |
7 | 304.26M |
|
0 |
8 | 203.16M |
|
0 |
9 | 324.26M |
|
0 |
10 | 298.24M |
|
0 |
11 | 290.91M |
|
0 |
12 | 357.18M |
|
0 |
13 | 447.76M |
|
0 |
14 | 460.28M |
|
0 |
15 | 462.90M |
|
0 |
16 | 506.03M |
|
0 |
Peak memory transfer: The graph shows the relative peak memory transfer rate for the tested CPU:
Block size | Performance | ||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 21.52M |
|
2.76M |
Graphics Performance
AMD Radeon R9 200 Series versus...
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series
Graphics performance (complex geometry): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly complex geometry:
Vertexes | Performance | ||
---|---|---|---|
20K | 60 |
|
37 |
80K | 60 |
|
11 |
180K | 60 |
|
0 |
320K | 60 |
|
0 |
500K | 60 |
|
0 |
980K | 43 |
|
0 |
2M | 26 |
|
0 |
3.92M | 15 |
|
0 |
Graphics performance (multiple textures): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly large amounts of textures:
Texture swaps | Performance | ||
---|---|---|---|
960 | 59 |
|
34 |
1.92K | 59 |
|
19 |
3.84K | 59 |
|
0 |
7.68K | 29 |
|
0 |
15.36K | 20 |
|
0 |
Graphics performance (pixel shaders): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly complex fragment shader programs:
Program Size | Performance | ||
---|---|---|---|
9 | 60 |
|
33 |
21 | 60 |
|
16 |
57 | 60 |
|
0 |
165 | 60 |
|
0 |
489 | 48 |
|
0 |
1.46K | 24 |
|
0 |
4.38K | 8 |
|
0 |
Memory Performance
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3960X CPU @ 3.30GHz versus...
Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz
Memory performance: The graph shows the relative data transfer rate at for memory blocks of increasing size.:
Swap size (Bytes) | Performance | ||
---|---|---|---|
500 | 19.27M |
|
1.51M |
1K | 19.39M |
|
2.05M |
2K | 19.71M |
|
2.03M |
4K | 20.46M |
|
2.38M |
8K | 20.94M |
|
2.49M |
16K | 21.21M |
|
2.43M |
32K | 21.39M |
|
2.29M |
64K | 21.24M |
|
2.73M |
128K | 20.93M |
|
2.41M |
256K | 20.10M |
|
2.25M |
512K | 20.19M |
|
1.83M |
1.02M | 20.21M |
|
1.20M |
2.05M | 20.14M |
|
1.09M |
4.10M | 19.93M |
|
1.40M |
8.19M | 16.66M |
|
1.41M |
16.38M | 15.30M |
|
491.52K |
32.77M | 15.20M |
|
1.51M |