These are the Headline Benchmark results for a computer equipped with a AMD FX(tm)-6300 Six-Core Processor, 8.53G RAM and a AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series graphics processor. Result submitted by SigmaNick.
Compared with: Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz, 3G RAM and a ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series. (Change)
Headline scores: How well the computer performs generally, and for some common usage scenarios:
| Headline | 11.42 |
|
3.30 |
| Gaming | 11.51 |
|
2.21 |
| Office | 9.58 |
|
3.30 |
| Creative | 10.09 |
|
2.13 |
Share this result with your friends!
Components: Performance of the main parts of the computer:
| CPU | 11.15 |
|
3.89 |
| Graphics | 11.36 |
|
1.50 |
| Memory | 12.58 |
|
3.98 |
CPU Performance
AMD FX(tm)-6300 Six-Core Processor versus...
Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz
Integer arithmetic: The graph shows integer arithmetic performance at increasing numbers of threads:
| Threads | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50.12M |
|
18.45M |
| 2 | 99.31M |
|
30.50M |
| 3 | 142.01M |
|
31.98M |
| 4 | 138.05M |
|
35.70M |
| 5 | 177.06M |
|
0 |
| 6 | 171.72M |
|
0 |
| 7 | 227.80M |
|
0 |
| 8 | 266.09M |
|
0 |
| 9 | 274.95M |
|
0 |
| 10 | 285.02M |
|
0 |
Floating point arithmetic: The graph shows floating point arithmetic performance at increasing numbers of threads:
| Threads | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 33.06M |
|
17.41M |
| 2 | 65.47M |
|
25.78M |
| 3 | 93.40M |
|
31.52M |
| 4 | 120.90M |
|
33.46M |
| 5 | 83.94M |
|
0 |
| 6 | 158.55M |
|
0 |
| 7 | 136.98M |
|
0 |
| 8 | 166.33M |
|
0 |
| 9 | 168.25M |
|
0 |
| 10 | 169.58M |
|
0 |
Peak memory transfer: The graph shows the relative peak memory transfer rate for the tested CPU:
| Block size | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11.17M |
|
2.76M |
Graphics Performance
AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series versus...
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series
Graphics performance (complex geometry): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly complex geometry:
| Vertexes | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 20K | 59 |
|
37 |
| 80K | 60 |
|
11 |
| 180K | 59 |
|
0 |
| 320K | 59 |
|
0 |
| 500K | 60 |
|
0 |
| 980K | 37 |
|
0 |
| 2M | 22 |
|
0 |
| 3.92M | 13 |
|
0 |
Graphics performance (multiple textures): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly large amounts of textures:
| Texture swaps | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 960 | 59 |
|
34 |
| 1.92K | 59 |
|
19 |
| 3.84K | 58 |
|
0 |
| 7.68K | 29 |
|
0 |
| 15.36K | 15 |
|
0 |
Graphics performance (pixel shaders): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly complex fragment shader programs:
| Program Size | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 60 |
|
33 |
| 21 | 60 |
|
16 |
| 57 | 60 |
|
0 |
| 165 | 60 |
|
0 |
| 489 | 22 |
|
0 |
| 1.46K | 7 |
|
0 |
Memory Performance
AMD FX(tm)-6300 Six-Core Processor versus...
Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz
Memory performance: The graph shows the relative data transfer rate at for memory blocks of increasing size.:
| Swap size (Bytes) | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | 10.13M |
|
1.51M |
| 1K | 10.89M |
|
2.05M |
| 2K | 11.15M |
|
2.03M |
| 4K | 11.14M |
|
2.38M |
| 8K | 11.16M |
|
2.49M |
| 16K | 10.87M |
|
2.43M |
| 32K | 10.85M |
|
2.29M |
| 64K | 10.95M |
|
2.73M |
| 128K | 10.75M |
|
2.41M |
| 256K | 10.79M |
|
2.25M |
| 512K | 10.69M |
|
1.83M |
| 1.02M | 10.36M |
|
1.20M |
| 2.05M | 9.53M |
|
1.09M |
| 4.10M | 9.18M |
|
1.40M |
| 8.19M | 7.83M |
|
1.41M |
| 16.38M | 7.83M |
|
491.52K |
| 32.77M | 7.80M |
|
1.51M |