These are the Headline Benchmark results for a computer equipped with a Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 8.53G RAM and a GeForce GTX 1050/PCIe/SSE2 graphics processor. Result submitted by Ags_i7_gtx1050.
Compared with: Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz, 3G RAM and a ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series. (Change)
Headline scores: How well the computer performs generally, and for some common usage scenarios:
| Headline | 13.36 |
|
3.30 |
| Gaming | 11.29 |
|
2.21 |
| Office | 11.75 |
|
3.30 |
| Creative | 11.83 |
|
2.13 |
Share this result with your friends!
Components: Performance of the main parts of the computer:
| CPU | 15.60 |
|
3.89 |
| Graphics | 10.97 |
|
1.50 |
| Memory | 8.21 |
|
3.98 |
CPU Performance
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40GHz versus...
Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz
Integer arithmetic: The graph shows integer arithmetic performance at increasing numbers of threads:
| Threads | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.49M |
|
18.45M |
| 2 | 82.14M |
|
30.50M |
| 3 | 82.92M |
|
31.98M |
| 4 | 129.29M |
|
35.70M |
| 5 | 89.54M |
|
0 |
| 6 | 46.02M |
|
0 |
| 7 | 45.95M |
|
0 |
| 8 | 228.56M |
|
0 |
| 9 | 295.54M |
|
0 |
| 10 | 341.28M |
|
0 |
| 11 | 346.64M |
|
0 |
| 12 | 387.31M |
|
0 |
Floating point arithmetic: The graph shows floating point arithmetic performance at increasing numbers of threads:
| Threads | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 42.78M |
|
17.41M |
| 2 | 43.79M |
|
25.78M |
| 3 | 86.73M |
|
31.52M |
| 4 | 94.55M |
|
33.46M |
| 5 | 97.18M |
|
0 |
| 6 | 101.94M |
|
0 |
| 7 | 259.20M |
|
0 |
| 8 | 257.49M |
|
0 |
| 9 | 431.70M |
|
0 |
| 10 | 433.23M |
|
0 |
| 11 | 437.86M |
|
0 |
| 12 | 442.94M |
|
0 |
Peak memory transfer: The graph shows the relative peak memory transfer rate for the tested CPU:
| Block size | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.47M |
|
2.76M |
Graphics Performance
GeForce GTX 1050/PCIe/SSE2 versus...
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series
Graphics performance (complex geometry): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly complex geometry:
| Vertexes | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 20K | 60 |
|
37 |
| 80K | 60 |
|
11 |
| 180K | 60 |
|
0 |
| 320K | 54 |
|
0 |
| 500K | 36 |
|
0 |
| 980K | 19 |
|
0 |
Graphics performance (multiple textures): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly large amounts of textures:
| Texture swaps | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 960 | 60 |
|
34 |
| 1.92K | 60 |
|
19 |
| 3.84K | 60 |
|
0 |
| 7.68K | 41 |
|
0 |
| 15.36K | 21 |
|
0 |
| 30.72K | 10 |
|
0 |
Graphics performance (pixel shaders): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly complex fragment shader programs:
| Program Size | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 60 |
|
33 |
| 21 | 60 |
|
16 |
| 57 | 60 |
|
0 |
| 165 | 60 |
|
0 |
| 489 | 22 |
|
0 |
| 1.46K | 7 |
|
0 |
Memory Performance
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40GHz versus...
Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz
Memory performance: The graph shows the relative data transfer rate at for memory blocks of increasing size.:
| Swap size (Bytes) | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | 5.29M |
|
1.51M |
| 1K | 5.48M |
|
2.05M |
| 2K | 5.98M |
|
2.03M |
| 4K | 6.16M |
|
2.38M |
| 8K | 6.37M |
|
2.49M |
| 16K | 6.45M |
|
2.43M |
| 32K | 6.44M |
|
2.29M |
| 64K | 6.49M |
|
2.73M |
| 128K | 6.47M |
|
2.41M |
| 256K | 6.42M |
|
2.25M |
| 512K | 6.39M |
|
1.83M |
| 1.02M | 5.80M |
|
1.20M |
| 2.05M | 3.97M |
|
1.09M |
| 4.10M | 3.93M |
|
1.40M |
| 8.19M | 3.95M |
|
1.41M |
| 16.38M | 3.96M |
|
491.52K |
| 32.77M | 3.87M |
|
1.51M |