These are the Headline Benchmark results for a computer equipped with a Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz, 8.29G RAM and a Intel(R) HD Graphics 3000 graphics processor. Result submitted by aloof.
Compared with: Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz, 3G RAM and a ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series. (Change)
Headline scores: How well the computer performs generally, and for some common usage scenarios:
| Headline | 10.59 |
|
3.30 |
| Gaming | 6.96 |
|
2.21 |
| Office | 10.52 |
|
3.30 |
| Creative | 8.06 |
|
2.13 |
Share this result with your friends!
Components: Performance of the main parts of the computer:
| CPU | 11.47 |
|
3.89 |
| Graphics | 4.37 |
|
1.50 |
| Memory | 17.03 |
|
3.98 |
CPU Performance
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz versus...
Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz
Integer arithmetic: The graph shows integer arithmetic performance at increasing numbers of threads:
| Threads | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 49.93M |
|
18.45M |
| 2 | 48.96M |
|
30.50M |
| 3 | 144.44M |
|
31.98M |
| 4 | 141.99M |
|
35.70M |
| 5 | 217.83M |
|
0 |
| 6 | 237.96M |
|
0 |
| 7 | 261.83M |
|
0 |
| 8 | 260.44M |
|
0 |
Floating point arithmetic: The graph shows floating point arithmetic performance at increasing numbers of threads:
| Threads | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.59M |
|
17.41M |
| 2 | 79.18M |
|
25.78M |
| 3 | 77.82M |
|
31.52M |
| 4 | 76.50M |
|
33.46M |
| 5 | 183.82M |
|
0 |
| 6 | 195.95M |
|
0 |
| 7 | 186.39M |
|
0 |
| 8 | 203.16M |
|
0 |
Peak memory transfer: The graph shows the relative peak memory transfer rate for the tested CPU:
| Block size | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.03M |
|
2.76M |
Graphics Performance
Intel(R) HD Graphics 3000 versus...
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series
Graphics performance (complex geometry): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly complex geometry:
| Vertexes | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 20K | 60 |
|
37 |
| 80K | 52 |
|
11 |
| 180K | 24 |
|
0 |
| 320K | 14 |
|
0 |
Graphics performance (multiple textures): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly large amounts of textures:
| Texture swaps | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 960 | 59 |
|
34 |
| 1.92K | 30 |
|
19 |
| 3.84K | 20 |
|
0 |
Graphics performance (pixel shaders): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly complex fragment shader programs:
| Program Size | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 60 |
|
33 |
| 21 | 60 |
|
16 |
| 57 | 24 |
|
0 |
| 165 | 8 |
|
0 |
Memory Performance
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz versus...
Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz
Memory performance: The graph shows the relative data transfer rate at for memory blocks of increasing size.:
| Swap size (Bytes) | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | 15.66M |
|
1.51M |
| 1K | 16.26M |
|
2.05M |
| 2K | 16.47M |
|
2.03M |
| 4K | 16.86M |
|
2.38M |
| 8K | 16.98M |
|
2.49M |
| 16K | 17.05M |
|
2.43M |
| 32K | 17.02M |
|
2.29M |
| 64K | 16.91M |
|
2.73M |
| 128K | 16.89M |
|
2.41M |
| 256K | 16.42M |
|
2.25M |
| 512K | 16.47M |
|
1.83M |
| 1.02M | 16.52M |
|
1.20M |
| 2.05M | 15.95M |
|
1.09M |
| 4.10M | 12.01M |
|
1.40M |
| 8.19M | 11.55M |
|
1.41M |
| 16.38M | 11.53M |
|
491.52K |
| 32.77M | 11.34M |
|
1.51M |