These are the Headline Benchmark results for a computer equipped with a Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3210M CPU @ 2.50GHz, 8,49G RAM and a Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000 graphics processor. Result submitted by Onno.
Compared with: Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz, 3G RAM and a ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series. (Change)
Headline scores: How well the computer performs generally, and for some common usage scenarios:
| Headline | 8.51 |
|
3.30 |
| Gaming | 5.42 |
|
2.21 |
| Office | 8.51 |
|
3.30 |
| Creative | 5.24 |
|
2.13 |
Share this result with your friends!
Components: Performance of the main parts of the computer:
| CPU | 8.50 |
|
3.89 |
| Graphics | 2.36 |
|
1.50 |
| Memory | 17.12 |
|
3.98 |
CPU Performance
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3210M CPU @ 2.50GHz versus...
Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz
Integer arithmetic: The graph shows integer arithmetic performance at increasing numbers of threads:
| Threads | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 42.24M |
|
18.45M |
| 2 | 80.46M |
|
30.50M |
| 3 | 74.51M |
|
31.98M |
| 4 | 140.40M |
|
35.70M |
| 5 | 144.80M |
|
0 |
| 6 | 144.33M |
|
0 |
Floating point arithmetic: The graph shows floating point arithmetic performance at increasing numbers of threads:
| Threads | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 36.30M |
|
17.41M |
| 2 | 68.74M |
|
25.78M |
| 3 | 95.01M |
|
31.52M |
| 4 | 29.51M |
|
33.46M |
| 5 | 121.87M |
|
0 |
| 6 | 120.27M |
|
0 |
Peak memory transfer: The graph shows the relative peak memory transfer rate for the tested CPU:
| Block size | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.65M |
|
2.76M |
Graphics Performance
Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000 versus...
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series
The graphics results indicate driver issues were encountered.
Graphics performance (complex geometry): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly complex geometry:
| Vertexes | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 20K | 60 |
|
37 |
| 80K | 33 |
|
11 |
| 180K | 15 |
|
0 |
Graphics performance (multiple textures): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly large amounts of textures:
| Texture swaps | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 960 | 60 |
|
34 |
| 1.92K | 59 |
|
19 |
| 3.84K | 35 |
|
0 |
| 7.68K | 18 |
|
0 |
Graphics performance (pixel shaders): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly complex fragment shader programs:
| Program Size | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 60 |
|
33 |
| 21 | 60 |
|
16 |
| 57 | 60 |
|
0 |
| 165 | 60 |
|
0 |
| 489 | 60 |
|
0 |
| 1.46K | 60 |
|
0 |
| 4.38K | 60 |
|
0 |
| 13.12K | 60 |
|
0 |
| 39.37K | 60 |
|
0 |
Memory Performance
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3210M CPU @ 2.50GHz versus...
Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz
Memory performance: The graph shows the relative data transfer rate at for memory blocks of increasing size.:
| Swap size (Bytes) | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | 15.75M |
|
1.51M |
| 1K | 17.12M |
|
2.05M |
| 2K | 17.09M |
|
2.03M |
| 4K | 17.46M |
|
2.38M |
| 8K | 17.48M |
|
2.49M |
| 16K | 17.56M |
|
2.43M |
| 32K | 17.12M |
|
2.29M |
| 64K | 16.96M |
|
2.73M |
| 128K | 16.88M |
|
2.41M |
| 256K | 16.15M |
|
2.25M |
| 512K | 16.08M |
|
1.83M |
| 1.02M | 15.92M |
|
1.20M |
| 2.05M | 14.41M |
|
1.09M |
| 4.10M | 12.39M |
|
1.40M |
| 8.19M | 12.11M |
|
1.41M |
| 16.38M | 12.09M |
|
491.52K |
| 32.77M | 11.73M |
|
1.51M |