These are the Headline Benchmark results for a computer equipped with a Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 8.53G RAM and a Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics graphics processor. Result submitted by Ags_i7_rx480.
Compared with: Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz, 3G RAM and a ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series. (Change)
Headline scores: How well the computer performs generally, and for some common usage scenarios:
| Headline | 16.54 |
|
3.30 |
| Gaming | 15.88 |
|
2.21 |
| Office | 13.98 |
|
3.30 |
| Creative | 14.67 |
|
2.13 |
Share this result with your friends!
Components: Performance of the main parts of the computer:
| CPU | 16.16 |
|
3.89 |
| Graphics | 15.01 |
|
1.50 |
| Memory | 20.83 |
|
3.98 |
CPU Performance
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40GHz versus...
Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz
Integer arithmetic: The graph shows integer arithmetic performance at increasing numbers of threads:
| Threads | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 45.87M |
|
18.45M |
| 2 | 46.11M |
|
30.50M |
| 3 | 87.67M |
|
31.98M |
| 4 | 89.26M |
|
35.70M |
| 5 | 90.10M |
|
0 |
| 6 | 91.67M |
|
0 |
| 7 | 183.86M |
|
0 |
| 8 | 275.80M |
|
0 |
| 9 | 281.52M |
|
0 |
| 10 | 358.08M |
|
0 |
| 11 | 361.19M |
|
0 |
| 12 | 394.01M |
|
0 |
Floating point arithmetic: The graph shows floating point arithmetic performance at increasing numbers of threads:
| Threads | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 62.78M |
|
17.41M |
| 2 | 118.60M |
|
25.78M |
| 3 | 119.33M |
|
31.52M |
| 4 | 119.85M |
|
33.46M |
| 5 | 233.96M |
|
0 |
| 6 | 223.27M |
|
0 |
| 7 | 164.57M |
|
0 |
| 8 | 258.26M |
|
0 |
| 9 | 382.76M |
|
0 |
| 10 | 423.80M |
|
0 |
| 11 | 433.69M |
|
0 |
| 12 | 435.88M |
|
0 |
Peak memory transfer: The graph shows the relative peak memory transfer rate for the tested CPU:
| Block size | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22.43M |
|
2.76M |
Graphics Performance
Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics versus...
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series
Graphics performance (complex geometry): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly complex geometry:
| Vertexes | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 20K | 60 |
|
37 |
| 80K | 59 |
|
11 |
| 180K | 60 |
|
0 |
| 320K | 59 |
|
0 |
| 500K | 60 |
|
0 |
| 980K | 53 |
|
0 |
| 2M | 30 |
|
0 |
| 3.92M | 16 |
|
0 |
Graphics performance (multiple textures): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly large amounts of textures:
| Texture swaps | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 960 | 59 |
|
34 |
| 1.92K | 60 |
|
19 |
| 3.84K | 59 |
|
0 |
| 7.68K | 59 |
|
0 |
| 15.36K | 30 |
|
0 |
| 30.72K | 15 |
|
0 |
Graphics performance (pixel shaders): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly complex fragment shader programs:
| Program Size | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 60 |
|
33 |
| 21 | 60 |
|
16 |
| 57 | 60 |
|
0 |
| 165 | 60 |
|
0 |
| 489 | 48 |
|
0 |
| 1.46K | 24 |
|
0 |
| 4.38K | 8 |
|
0 |
Memory Performance
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40GHz versus...
Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz
Memory performance: The graph shows the relative data transfer rate at for memory blocks of increasing size.:
| Swap size (Bytes) | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | 21.98M |
|
1.51M |
| 1K | 21.34M |
|
2.05M |
| 2K | 21.45M |
|
2.03M |
| 4K | 21.71M |
|
2.38M |
| 8K | 22M |
|
2.49M |
| 16K | 22.15M |
|
2.43M |
| 32K | 22.33M |
|
2.29M |
| 64K | 22.11M |
|
2.73M |
| 128K | 22.22M |
|
2.41M |
| 256K | 22.11M |
|
2.25M |
| 512K | 22.30M |
|
1.83M |
| 1.02M | 22.28M |
|
1.20M |
| 2.05M | 22.11M |
|
1.09M |
| 4.10M | 21.52M |
|
1.40M |
| 8.19M | 17.55M |
|
1.41M |
| 16.38M | 15.76M |
|
491.52K |
| 32.77M | 15.20M |
|
1.51M |