These are the Headline Benchmark results for a computer equipped with a Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3632QM CPU @ 2.20GHz, 8.05M RAM and a AMD Radeon HD 7600M Series graphics processor. Result submitted by Slyth2727.
Compared with: Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz, 3G RAM and a ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series. (Change)
Headline scores: How well the computer performs generally, and for some common usage scenarios:
| Headline | 11.92 |
|
3.30 |
| Gaming | 9.90 |
|
2.21 |
| Office | 11.02 |
|
3.30 |
| Creative | 9.60 |
|
2.13 |
Share this result with your friends!
Components: Performance of the main parts of the computer:
| CPU | 11.95 |
|
3.89 |
| Graphics | 8.13 |
|
1.50 |
| Memory | 18.26 |
|
3.98 |
CPU Performance
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3632QM CPU @ 2.20GHz versus...
Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz
Integer arithmetic: The graph shows integer arithmetic performance at increasing numbers of threads:
| Threads | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 44.83M |
|
18.45M |
| 2 | 85.95M |
|
30.50M |
| 3 | 119.57M |
|
31.98M |
| 4 | 157.59M |
|
35.70M |
| 5 | 74.62M |
|
0 |
| 6 | 213.24M |
|
0 |
| 7 | 203.02M |
|
0 |
| 8 | 195.11M |
|
0 |
| 9 | 248.50M |
|
0 |
| 10 | 253.47M |
|
0 |
| 11 | 287.67M |
|
0 |
| 12 | 257.91M |
|
0 |
Floating point arithmetic: The graph shows floating point arithmetic performance at increasing numbers of threads:
| Threads | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38.98M |
|
17.41M |
| 2 | 74.91M |
|
25.78M |
| 3 | 104.32M |
|
31.52M |
| 4 | 137.69M |
|
33.46M |
| 5 | 127.87M |
|
0 |
| 6 | 149.72M |
|
0 |
| 7 | 198.79M |
|
0 |
| 8 | 162.87M |
|
0 |
| 9 | 203.53M |
|
0 |
| 10 | 229.29M |
|
0 |
| 11 | 212.58M |
|
0 |
| 12 | 214.54M |
|
0 |
Peak memory transfer: The graph shows the relative peak memory transfer rate for the tested CPU:
| Block size | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19.26M |
|
2.76M |
Graphics Performance
AMD Radeon HD 7600M Series versus...
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series
Graphics performance (complex geometry): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly complex geometry:
| Vertexes | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 20K | 60 |
|
37 |
| 80K | 60 |
|
11 |
| 180K | 48 |
|
0 |
| 320K | 30 |
|
0 |
| 500K | 20 |
|
0 |
Graphics performance (multiple textures): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly large amounts of textures:
| Texture swaps | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 960 | 60 |
|
34 |
| 1.92K | 60 |
|
19 |
| 3.84K | 47 |
|
0 |
| 7.68K | 26 |
|
0 |
| 15.36K | 14 |
|
0 |
Graphics performance (pixel shaders): The graph shows the frames rendered per second for increasingly complex fragment shader programs:
| Program Size | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 60 |
|
33 |
| 21 | 60 |
|
16 |
| 57 | 60 |
|
0 |
| 165 | 25 |
|
0 |
| 489 | 8 |
|
0 |
Memory Performance
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3632QM CPU @ 2.20GHz versus...
Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz
Memory performance: The graph shows the relative data transfer rate at for memory blocks of increasing size.:
| Swap size (Bytes) | Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | 17.39M |
|
1.51M |
| 1K | 18.28M |
|
2.05M |
| 2K | 18.12M |
|
2.03M |
| 4K | 18.91M |
|
2.38M |
| 8K | 19.27M |
|
2.49M |
| 16K | 19.18M |
|
2.43M |
| 32K | 18.51M |
|
2.29M |
| 64K | 18.70M |
|
2.73M |
| 128K | 18.38M |
|
2.41M |
| 256K | 17.31M |
|
2.25M |
| 512K | 17.09M |
|
1.83M |
| 1.02M | 17.28M |
|
1.20M |
| 2.05M | 17.12M |
|
1.09M |
| 4.10M | 15.94M |
|
1.40M |
| 8.19M | 13.16M |
|
1.41M |
| 16.38M | 12.75M |
|
491.52K |
| 32.77M | 12.78M |
|
1.51M |